Fortellis / CDK Drive (vendor source) · Mobile service
Curbee
Curbee
Marketplace or vendor integration claims do not establish customer authorization, exact endpoint access, fees or deployed performance. Recommendations below are editorial hypotheses.
- Workflow and value hypothesis
- Coordinate mobile-service bookings, routes, technician work and customer updates. Value hypothesis: improve route density and first-visit completion.
- Buyer and operating owner
- Mobile-service manager and fixed-operations director
- Platform compatibility evidence
- Vendor M.A.R.S. platform page names native CDK integration.
- Read/write and API depth
- The page describes booking, routing and technician workflows, but does not establish precise CDK Drive read/write operations.
- Public pricing
- Unknown: an illustrative ROI-calculator cost input is not a binding quote.
- Competition, overlap and possible gaps
- Compare current dispatch tools and native scheduling. Mobile routing, travel time and van capacity can matter more than appointment volume.
- Adoption evidence and limits
- No endpoint test, offline workflow assessment or independent productivity measurement. Vendor ROI assumptions are not customer results.
- Next research step
- Clarify supported CDK records, service-area constraints, offline behavior, dispatch exceptions and van-level pricing before testing route economics.
Evidence and sources
- Curbee product evidence — Vendor M.A.R.S. platform page names native CDK integration.